bracket
what should be said.

A curated collection of wild, outrageous, and hilarious profanity definitions and pronunciations for your churning, educational learning, and entertainment.

Results for "Ezekiel 35:10"

Ezekiel 35:10

Definition: Because thou hast said, These two nations and these two countries shall be mine, and we will possess it; whereas the LORD was there:


Explanation: Okay, let's break down this verse from Ezekiel 35:10. Itโ€™s a really interesting and somewhat mysterious passage! Here's an explanation in simple terms: The Basic Idea: This verse is about Godโ€™s plan for the future and how He intends to use the land. It speaks of a covenant โ€“ a promise โ€“ between God and a specific group of people. Let's unpack it piece by piece: "Because thou hast said, These two nations and these two countries shall be mine..." - This is the core of the statement. God promised to take possession of these particular regions (two nations and two countries). Heโ€™s establishing a claim on them. It's like saying, "I intend to rule over this area." "...and we will possess it; whereas the LORD was there:" - This is where it gets a little more complex. โ€œPossessโ€ means to control or dominate something. The phrase "whereas the LORD was there" adds a layer of significance. It suggests that God wasn't just talking about taking possession โ€“ He was actively present and overseeing the process. Putting it together - A Possible Interpretation: This verse suggests a period where God is establishing His authority and control over these regions, with the understanding that He will ultimately be in charge of them. Itโ€™s not necessarily about immediate conquest; rather, it's about Godโ€™s ongoing presence and influence as he works to shape the future. Important Note: This verse is often interpreted symbolically, and its exact meaning has been debated over time. Itโ€™s a significant statement that points towards a larger plan of God's providence โ€“ His overarching work in the world. --- Would you like me to: Explain another part of Ezekiel 35? Discuss the historical context of this verse? Explore different possible interpretations?